Types of Robotic Arms: A Complete Guide to Choosing the Right Industrial Robot

Robotic arms are no longer futuristic symbols locked inside automotive plants. Today, they are everywhere—electronics factories, metal workshops, food processing lines, warehouses, laboratories, and even hospitals.

But “robotic arm” is not one machine.

There are multiple types of robotic arms, each built on a different mechanical structure, with different motion capabilities, costs, accuracy levels, and real-world trade-offs. Choosing the wrong type can mean wasted investment, integration nightmares, and disappointing productivity.

This guide explains all major types of robotic arms, how they work, where they shine, where they struggle, and how to select the right one based on actual production needs and data.

What Is a Robotic Arm?

A robotic arm is a programmable mechanical system designed to move materials, tools, or parts through multiple axes of motion. Most industrial robotic arms mimic the structure of a human arm, consisting of:

• Base

• Shoulder

• Elbow

• Wrist

• End effector (gripper, welder, suction cup, tool, etc.)

Modern robotic arms typically operate with 4 to 7 axes, allowing complex positioning and orientation in three-dimensional space.

Why Robotic Arms Matter in Modern Industry

Robotic arms are adopted not for novelty, but for measurable results:

• Productivity increases of 20%–300%, depending on application

• Positioning repeatability as tight as ±0.02 mm

• 24/7 operation with consistent quality

• Reduced labor dependency

• Improved worker safety

They excel where tasks are repetitive, precise, dangerous, or fatigue-prone.

Main Types of Robotic Arms (By Mechanical Structure)

Industrial robotic arms are commonly classified into six core types. Each exists because it solves a different problem.

1. Articulated Robotic Arms

Structure

Articulated robots have rotary joints connected in a serial chain, similar to a human arm.

• Typically 4–7 axes

• Wide range of motion

• Compact footprint relative to reach

Key Data

• Payload range: 3 kg to 1,000+ kg

• Reach: 500 mm to 3,500 mm

• Repeatability: ±0.02–0.08 mm

Advantages

• Maximum flexibility

• Can reach around obstacles

• Suitable for complex paths

• Widely supported by software and accessories

Disadvantages

• Higher cost

• More complex programming

• Slower than delta robots for pick-and-place

Typical Applications

• Welding (arc, spot)

• Painting and coating

• Machine tending

• Assembly

• Palletizing

Articulated robots account for over 65% of global industrial robot installations, making them the industry backbone.

2. SCARA Robots (Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm)

Structure

SCARA robots move primarily in the horizontal plane with vertical Z-axis motion.

• Usually 4 axes

• Rigid vertically, flexible horizontally

Key Data

• Payload: 2–20 kg

• Cycle time: 0.3–0.6 seconds

• Repeatability: ±0.01–0.02 mm

Advantages

• Extremely fast

• High precision

• Excellent for repetitive tasks

• Simple integration

Disadvantages

• Limited vertical and angular movement

• Smaller working envelope

Typical Applications

• Electronics assembly

• PCB handling

• Small parts insertion

• Packaging

SCARA robots dominate electronics and light assembly lines where speed and accuracy matter more than reach.

3. Cartesian Robots (Gantry Robots)

Structure

Cartesian robots move along linear axes (X, Y, Z) using rails or gantries.

• Rectangular working space

• Motion is simple and predictable

Key Data

• Payload: Up to several tons

• Accuracy: ±0.01 mm achievable

• Workspace: Easily scalable

Advantages

• High rigidity

• Excellent accuracy

• Easy programming

• Low maintenance

Disadvantages

• Large physical footprint

• Limited angular motion

• Less flexible than articulated arms

Typical Applications

• CNC loading/unloading

• 3D printing

• Heavy material handling

• Automated storage systems

Cartesian robots are favored where precision and payload capacity outweigh flexibility.

4. Delta Robots (Parallel Robots)

Structure

Delta robots use parallel arms connected to a common base, moving a lightweight end effector.

Key Data

• Cycle time: 0.2–0.4 seconds

• Payload: 1–10 kg

• Repeatability: ±0.01 mm

Advantages

• Ultra-high speed

• Low inertia

• Ideal for lightweight products

Disadvantages

• Very limited payload

• Small working area

• Not suitable for heavy tools

Typical Applications

• Food sorting

• Pharmaceutical packaging

• High-speed pick-and-place

Delta robots are speed champions but niche specialists.

5. Cylindrical Robots

Structure

Cylindrical robots combine rotational and linear motion in a cylindrical workspace.

Advantages

• Simple mechanical design

• Good vertical reach

• Lower cost

Disadvantages

• Limited dexterity

• Declining popularity

Typical Applications

• Basic material handling

• Machine loading

Cylindrical robots are less common today but still used in legacy systems.

6. Polar (Spherical) Robots

Structure

Polar robots use rotational joints combined with telescoping arms, creating a spherical workspace.

Advantages

• Long reach

• Wide coverage area

Disadvantages

• Complex mechanics

• Lower precision

• Largely replaced by articulated robots

Polar robots are now rare in modern factories.

Collaborative Robotic Arms (Cobots): A Special Category

Cobots are not a separate mechanical type, but a design philosophy applied mainly to articulated arms.

Key Features

• Payload: 3–35 kg

• Built-in force sensors

• Speed and force limits

• No safety fencing required (in many cases)

Advantages

• Easy deployment

• Safe human interaction

• Lower integration cost

Disadvantages

• Slower speeds

• Limited payload

Cobots are ideal for SMEs, flexible production, and mixed human-robot environments.

Key Performance Metrics Buyers Must Understand

Payload

Maximum weight the robot can handle, including tool weight.

Reach

Maximum distance from base to end effector.

Repeatability

How accurately the robot returns to the same position.

Cycle Time

Speed of completing a full motion loop.

Degrees of Freedom (DOF)

Number of independent axes of motion.

These metrics determine suitability far more than brand names.

How to Choose the Right Robotic Arm

Choosing correctly requires answering practical questions:

What task will the robot perform?

• Welding → articulated

• Pick-and-place → delta or SCARA

• Heavy lifting → Cartesian or articulated

What payload is required?

Always include:

• Tool weight

• Safety margin (typically +20%)

How fast must the cycle be?

High-speed packaging demands different robots than precision assembly.

How complex is the motion?

Complex angles require more axes.

Space constraints?

Compact robots matter in crowded factories.

Problems Robotic Arms Solve in Real Applications

Labor Shortages

Robots work continuously without fatigue.

Quality Inconsistency

Repeatability ensures uniform output.

Workplace Safety

Robots handle hazardous tasks.

Production Scalability

Output can increase without hiring proportional labor.

Cost Control

ROI is often achieved within 12–36 months, depending on application.

Cost Overview (General Industry Data)

System integration often equals or exceeds robot cost.

Future Trends in Robotic Arms

• AI-assisted vision and motion planning

• Easier programming (no-code / low-code)

• Higher payload cobots

• Energy-efficient servo systems

Robots are becoming smarter, safer, and easier to deploy.

Final Thoughts: Matching the Tool to the Task

There is no “best” robotic arm—only the right one for a specific problem.

Factories that succeed with automation do not chase trends. They analyze:

• Task complexity

• Payload

• Speed

• Budget

• Integration reality

When robotic arms are chosen logically, they stop being machines—and start being profit centers.

FAQ: Types of Robotic Arms – Practical Buyer Questions

1. How many types of robotic arms are commonly used in industry?

In modern industrial applications, the most common types are articulated robots, SCARA robots, Cartesian (gantry) robots, delta robots, and collaborative robots (cobots). Each type is optimized for different tasks such as welding, assembly, pick-and-place, or heavy material handling.

2. Which robotic arm type is the most versatile?

Articulated robotic arms are the most versatile. With 6 or more axes, they can perform complex movements, reach around obstacles, and handle a wide range of applications from welding and painting to assembly and palletizing.

3. What is the difference between SCARA and articulated robots?

SCARA robots are designed for fast, precise horizontal motion, making them ideal for electronics assembly and small-part handling. Articulated robots offer full 3D flexibility but are generally slower and more expensive.

4. When should I choose a delta robot?

Delta robots are best for high-speed, lightweight pick-and-place operations, such as food sorting or pharmaceutical packaging. They are not suitable for heavy payloads or complex tool operations.

5. Are collaborative robotic arms suitable for mass production?

Collaborative robots are excellent for low-to-medium volume production, flexible workflows, and human-robot collaboration. For high-speed mass production, traditional industrial robots usually offer higher throughput.

6. What payload should I consider when selecting a robotic arm?

You should calculate total payload, including:

• Workpiece weight

• End effector or tool weight

• Safety margin (typically 20–30%)

Choosing an undersized robot reduces lifespan and accuracy.

7. How accurate are industrial robotic arms?

Most industrial robots offer repeatability between ±0.01 mm and ±0.08 mm, depending on type and price. SCARA and delta robots typically provide the highest repeatability for small-part applications.

8. What industries benefit most from robotic arms?

Robotic arms are widely used in:

• Automotive manufacturing

• Electronics and semiconductors

• Metal fabrication

• Food and beverage packaging

• Logistics and warehousing

Any industry with repetitive or hazardous tasks can benefit.

9. How long does it take to see ROI from a robotic arm?

Typical return on investment (ROI) ranges from 12 to 36 months, depending on labor costs, production volume, and integration efficiency. High-volume operations often achieve ROI faster.

10. What are the main limitations of robotic arms?

Robotic arms require:

• Proper integration and programming

• Stable production processes

• Initial capital investment

They are less effective in highly variable, low-repeatability tasks without vision or AI assistance.

11. Do robotic arms require complex programming?

Modern robotic arms support graphical interfaces, teach pendants, and offline programming software. Collaborative robots often require minimal coding, reducing deployment time.

12. How do I choose the right robotic arm for my factory?

Focus on:

• Application type

• Required speed and accuracy

• Payload and reach

• Available space

• Budget and integration capability

Matching the robot to the task is more important than choosing a famous brand.